The 4 Word Response To Angry Emails
Email is a terrible way to communicate. There are multiple studies showing about 50% of all emails are misinterpreted. My experience and your experience probably support that fact.
I have received angry emails from my customers, my peers and my leaders through the years. They can make me both angry and frustrated. Unfortunately, the way I choose to respond to those emails usually escalates the emotions involved.
We all have a choice in how we respond to these messages.
The Immediate Reply
Bad move. Most immediate replies are a response to what I perceive to be a challenge to my character or my competence. I respond with my pride.
I feel wronged, therefore I am going to defend myself. My emotions are high. So I pound out a quick response on the keyboard explaining myself, my motives, or my situation. Usually I include the reasons the sender is wrong about the conclusions he has made.
When I attempt to do all that via an immediate reply on email, I almost guarantee an immediate reply from the other person that restates their position.
Nothing gets accomplished except each person validating themselves, invalidating the other person and creating more angst.
The Reply All
I am sorry. But this is a ridiculous and cowardly way to handle a conflict. The Reply All brings other people into the conflict in order to protect my position and reputation. Again, my pride has taken over.
When someone has included others in their angry email to me, I want to defend myself in the court of public opinion. Using this method means I am more concerned about validating myself than finding a solution.
In actuality, most of the people on the receiving end of the Reply All do not want hear about my problems. They just want me to solve them because they have work to do.
The CCing of The Boss
As a person who’s been in charge of teams, I have been copied in on some pretty childish email arguments. I’ve been told I was included because they “just wanted to keep me informed.”
What this informs me of is my people cannot handle problems on their own. It tells me I may have to mediate a conflict between two adults just like I did with my children when they were in middle school.
When a boss is brought into one of these email altercations, neither party looks good. They are more likely to look like prideful and petulant children.
The 4 Word Response
I have learned a simple four word response to angry emails that has served me well. I believe if everyone used this response, a lot of wasted time and emotions would be eliminated from the work place.
When Can We Meet?
That’s it. I’ve decided I will only respond to an angry email with a face-to-face meeting. If geography makes that difficult, Skype is the next best answer. Why?
*Effective Communication is:
-
7% the words I use.
-
38% my tone of voice.
-
55% my body language.
* This study was actually looked at the effective communication of emotions. It used single words and not whole sentences. However I do believe these lessons still apply to larger communications even if the percentages may change.
Based on this breakdown, email misses 93% of what makes effective communication possible. A phone call is better because it misses only 55%. But ultimately a face-to-face meeting is the best way to communicate in these situations.
Plus, by asking for a meeting, I have time to put my pride and emotions to the side. If my ultimate goal is to find a solution, pride and anger will do little to get us to any sort of resolution.
It is crazy to me that people who work in the same building or even on the same floor, would engage in an angry email exchange.
As leaders we need to get off our rear ends and walk down the hall to face the issue. If our people are engaged in this activity, we need to tell them to handle it face-to-face from now on.
The Bottom Line:
To me, it doesn’t matter if I have been wronged. It doesn’t matter the tone I perceive the sender to have in that angry email. What matters is finding a solution.
The best way to diffuse the situation and find a resolution is to set up a meeting. All this takes is a little self-control, a little courage, and the desire to find a solution.
When can we meet?
This four word response has helped me exercise self-control, courage, and problem solving. As a result I handle angry emails in a much more efficient and honorable manner than in my past.
Question:
How much time gets wasted at work as a result of angry emails?
Great advice Dave. The data out there shows that people are more aggressive and less cooperative on email than in person. So just by meeting face to face you have set yourself up for more success than you would have via email.
The problem is, email is easy and quick. The average person thinks ‘I don’t have time to meet.’ The reality is it will cost you more in time, energy and emotion if you don’t meet.
My dad always says, “If doing the right thing were easy, everyone would be doing it.”
Well put, Dave. Responding this way can make a huge difference in a team’s dynamics. In four words, you communicate a host of unspoken messages:
– I value your input and will make time to hear what you have to say.
– This team’s performance is more important to me than my pride, or yours.
– I have the courage to sit with you and let you speak your mind, and I expect the same of you.
– Let’s figure out how to solve this before it becomes a bigger issue than it already is.
Looking back on my own careers, the leaders I admire all took the time to deal with issues respectfully and face to face. Ignoring an issue makes it fester; chewing somebody’s tail shuts them down. Dealing with issues directly shows courage and leadership–and even in the twenty-first century, it’s really courage that we follow.
Thanks!
Scott
Scott,
Those bullet points you shared are great! They add a lot to this conversation.
Dave
Mr. Anderson:
Please take a look at the Mehrabian study and what it actually said and meant. You advice is spot on but the credibility of anyone who uses that set of percentages to make this claim is at risk. Even many communication textbooks get this wrong.
Respectfully,
Bob Bevard
To all who have read my blog and the above comment–
The study I sight concerning communication was a very controlled study that looked at the way tone of voice and body language affected the interpretation of the speaker’s emotions when a listener heard a single word presented by different speakers with different tonality and body language.
The conclusions I have drawn in the past about what this study tells us may be too broad. I stand by the conclusions I make about face to face interactions. But, I am going to be more careful to clarify the objectives and findings of that study before I use that data in future talks or blogs.
Please forgive me for my incomplete research. Thank you Bob for sending me a private email with links to do the proper research.
Dave
Hello, your articles here The 4 Word Response To Angry Emails | Anderson Leadership Solutions to write well, thanks for sharing!
Dave, this is on target. Poor email communications can be like tossing a hand grenade, causing damage that goes well beyond what people might expect. Thanks for sending this again.
I think you just coined a phrase- The Hand Grenade Email!
Nicely done, I have actually forwarded this to someone who doesn’t understand how to communicate via e-mail.
I also like to use this as well “how can I help”
Great alternative phrase. Please continue to share this link with others. Perhaps we can make some changes occur!
I like “how can I help”. If the sender is truly upset with you or someone else, “When can we meet?” may come across as a challenge or threat.
The important thing is to get back to professionalism and handling conflict in a productive way!
Great tips.
I’d only add” less is more” !
Sage advice!
I agree wholeheartedly. Oftentimes the tone of an email is just perceived by the recipient. Someone else reading the email may not think it sounds angry at all. Or, given your mood, you might interpret it differently first think in the morning than you would later in the day. It’s always best to pick up the phone or meet face to face to handle a response.
Too often we think we know someone else’s motives and we never think they are good. That lends to misperceptions often as well. It is a bad habit to continue to believe we can read someone that well.
I totally agree– my Dad’s advice to me when I started in business, if you are angry write a letter ( today- email) do not send it, put it aside and read it again the next day — usually throw away ( delete). After the initial anger has faded we are always better able to communicate with the other person. I like the advice to meet face to face or offer to help!
Great advice!
There is nothing new under the sun! Unfortunately electronic communications has allowed us to respond without thinking things through like a letter would. But the premise holds true!
Technology may have expedited the communications process, but the quality has suffered dramatically. Unfortunately, electronic correspondence does become truncated to further shorten the process, with semi-sentences lacking pronouns and verbs. Texting will only allow the younger generation an additional opportunity to butcher syntax and grammar, but email is truly the worst way to communicate since it can be misconstrued so often, and the very reason that someone had to invent emoticons to help you decipher what the person meant tells you how far we have gone in the decay of the way we express ourselves. Besides “When can we meet?” the other statment that can facilitate this quandry is by simply telling them, “Let me give you a call.” amd talk it over that way, in lieu of needing to meet. One of the worst radio commercials I have heerd recently was for AT&T, one man suggests they meet over a steak to discuss their project and the othe one replies, there is no need, I have a great connection! We have dehumanized communication and it is only getting worse.
“Let me give you a call” is the fall back position if geography prevents a face to face. Good input!
Great discussion, keep it simple “when can we meet” is perfect and would certainly make me stop and think rather than send a hand grenade email..
Stopping and thinking is usually the first step to avoiding a lot of issues isn’t it? I should have added that to the process.
An angry email is an example of what we call “Electronic Body Language”: how our electronic actions and habits (those using email, telephone, teleconference, etc.) shape how we each appear electronically to others – our ‘electronic footprint’.
Everything we put out in cyberspace is there forever. It truly is our footprint.
Great advice/reminder. I have circulated this article around Brook Hill – thanks.
Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your website and in accession capital
to assert that I get in fact enjoyed accopunt your blog posts.
Any wayy I’ll be subscribning too your augment and eveen I achievement you access consistently fast.
Want to copy articles from other pages rewrite them in seconds and post on your site, or use for contextual backlinks?
You can save a lot of writing work, just search in google:
Daradess’s Rewriter
Very informative article, i’m regular reader of your blog.
I noticed that your website is outranked by many other websites in google’s
search results. You deserve to be in top ten. I know what can help you,
search in google for:
Omond’s tips outsource the work
thanks for interesting article. i really should have learned by now (at the age of 50) to not get drawn into people’s crazyness in emails -:)
my personal gripe are people/ strangers who email -following a request/ query in an online forum who then contact and instead of being kind enough to respond, insist of giving a mini lecture on what to do/ say – even to the point of chastising me if i haven’t responded to their response within a 24 hour window – i begin to feel my blood boil, i guess its the judgement i feel from them – in the past i have tried to respond with my ‘lets not judge people’ approach, but people are just crazy, and you can’t communicate rationally with crazy people, you have to be crazy yourself – and i’m not quite there yet, maybe one day, but quite frankly, life is too short to respond to people who are going to look down on you regardless of who you are – and insist of quoting to you from their ‘rule book of life’ 🙂
peace and light